Suppose a scientist at one of the nation’s largest drug companies knows a blockbuster drug has a higher probability of creating adverse side effects than it does treating the disease. Suppose the scientist keeps silent because his bonus is based on the sales of this drug. Is this scientist a criminal?

According to the government, this would NOT be criminal activity. If this ever became public, the company would be fined (a small fraction of the accumulated profits) and the scientist would get promoted. (I’m not making this up! This is how the government and its cronies have typically handled the deception of the tobacco industry, oil company “mishaps,” and banking fraud. For example, click [here,] [here] and [here].)

By our own moral code and conscience, we know the scientist should be wearing an orange jumpsuit. At the very least, he or she should be disgraced and banned from the profession; unless, of course, we’re talking about a politician or high-level government official.

On September 11, 2016, at a symposium in New York City, Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Forensic Structural Engineer and Department Chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering at University of Alaska Fairbanks,[1] said there was NO WAY the government is right about how Building 7 collapsed at the World Trade Center complex. It is now a conspiracy fact. Building 7 (WTC 7) did not collapse because of a fire. This third building was not hit by a plane. It had a minor fire from debris.

Why would this be important to one of the nation’s top forensic structural engineers? If WTC 7 collapsed because of a small fire, the industry has a MAJOR issue with steel-framed skyscrapers. IF WTC 7 happened as the government concluded, then buildings around the world should be immediately evacuated. London’s Grenfell Tower fire demonstrates what is supposed to happen. After its deadly inferno, it is still standing.  [Click here.]

When Dr. Hulsey was asked by a panel of attorneys, “’On a scale of 1 to 100, what is the possibility that WTC 7 could have collapsed simply because of fires?’ Hulsey replied, ‘Zero.’ He then said if any of his Ph.D. students had submitted the explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 that NIST (the government agency) represented, he would fail them.”[2] Hulsey’s presentation was the conclusion of a comprehensive scientific study he and a team of Ph.D. students completed in 2016. They proved the government’s conclusion was fake news.

[You can see the Building 7 collapse here (30-second loop).]

Leroy Hulsey isn’t a fringe kook. There are now 2,877 architects and engineers who have signed a petition demanding a new investigation into the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings.[3] These are professionals who are concerned about their design industry. They also know how buildings collapse.

One of these professionals is Peter Michael Ketcham, a former Mathematician at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) from 1997-2011. Ketcham was not involved in the 9-11 NIST report and ignored it, simply accepting the conclusion as fact. In 2016, a friend asked Ketcham if he ever looked at the 9-11 NIST study. He had not.

In December of 2016, he became furious with himself and NIST once he studied the report. He said, “The more I investigated, the more apparent it became that NIST had reached a predetermined conclusion that refused, avoided and dismissed the evidence.” His full explanation can be [viewed here]. One of his powerful conclusions, we non-engineers can easily understand, is a collapse such as WTC 7 is an “almost-symmetrical collapse of a steel-framed building into its own footprint, at freefall acceleration.” Ketcham said this isn’t possible without extensive demolition planning and implementation. Ketcham says a building collapse without this type of planning, would be disorderly, not orderly. [To hear other professionals make similar comments, click here.]

Another professional demanding truth is Richard Gage, Architect, AIA. With over 30 years of professional experience, Gage is the founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. In an accredited continuing education course for architects, Gage presents the 10 characteristics of a demolition, or “explosive destruction.” Gage demonstrates all 10 tests are fulfilled in the collapse of Building 7. In response to the question whether debris needed to be evaluated to definitively prove the WTC 7 collapse was a demolition, Gabe said, “No.” Gabe defends his industry’s universal agreement of these 10 characteristics as legal proof of an explosive collapse. [Click here for his Part 1 presentation.]

So why do you need to know this stuff? I have four conclusions.

  1. Everything I have presented is known to ALL major news organizations. If you are learning this for the first time, you should reassess your news sources. You are being deceived. You have been duped. Your news channels are part of the deep state propaganda. I could name names, but it doesn’t matter. If you are hearing all of this from me, and not from your favorite TV news star, you are too trusting! You may be gullible. You should now hear news with skepticism. That highly paid news reporter or anchor—an actor or actress, really–doesn’t deserve your respect. It is not possible I know something the multi-million-dollar news organizations of Fox News, ABC, NBC, FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc., do not already know. They know what I know. They just don’t want you to know it. Why?
  2. Who was the FBI Director during 9-11? Answer: Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Mueller was appointed FBI Director seven days before the three buildings collapsed. It is likely he didn’t have anything to do with the set-up of these events. But, he was responsible for the avoidance of evidence, the unusual cleanup of a crime scene, and the destruction of nearly all of the physical evidence (with much of the steel and concrete hastily exported to China and India for recycling). For more on this, click [here]. Mueller has more baggage than just 9-11 [click here], but 9-11 is the most significant. Given his acceptance and cover-up of what is now hard evidence, Mueller is part of the swamp President Trump wants to drain. So why is he the Special Counsel of Russiagate? Who appointed him for this role? (We know the answer, but what does this say about whether Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein lives in the swamp? Why haven’t these swamp dwellers been removed from powerful positions?)

If Mueller uses his position and authority, to investigate the alleged felonies of James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and DNC operatives; then I’m wrong! Perhaps Mueller has had a born-again ethical experience and will now pull the plug on the deep state. I’ll admit when I’m wrong. Until then, I’ll connect the dots and stick with my skepticism; as should you.

  1. The mounting evidence of the government’s involvement in 9-11 does not automatically implicate President Bush or even Vice President Chaney. But, given what we now know, it certainly does implicate the “deep state.” There is a coordinated element within our government that had a role in 9-11. It should not be a leap to connect the deep state with the progressive establishment (both Republicans and Democrats). Enter: Mike Pence. Our Vice President was the leader of the progressive Republican coalition from January 3, 2009, to January 3, 2011 (he was the Chair of the House Republican Conference). Pence served in the House of Representatives from January 3, 2001, to January 3, 2013.

Let’s give Vice President Pence the benefit of doubt. Let’s assume, at best, he only learned of this conclusive 9-11 evidence in 2016. He certainly knows what you now know. He would have learned of it far earlier than my personal enlightenment. Perhaps, he learned of this through candidate Donald Trump. Before Pence said, “Yes,” to Trump’s offer, don’t you think he would have heard Trump’s 9-11 comments: “How could a plane, even a 767 or 747, or whatever it might have been…how could it possibly go through the steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously. Because I can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall…it was almost just like a can of soup.” [Click here for Trump’s original comments.]

At best, Vice President Pence now understands he has been deceived and, like us, duped. Because of his past leadership of the progressive Republican arm, he could now retrace past conversations and know who to blame for his deception. Agree?

Now review your media watch and ask yourself, “Is Vice President Pence really leading the charge against the deep state, or is he keeping the door open to possibly be the future president of the deep state?” I’m personally glad Pence is Vice President. But, I’m very skeptical. I trust President Trump, because of his character and past, much more than I do VP Pence. It concerns me when conservative friends tell me they’d be more comfortable with a President Pence than President Trump. I think that would close the door to draining the swamp. Be careful about what you wish for.

  1. So how does this impact our personal finances? Let’s keep this short and simple. SUPPOSE it becomes known through Wikileaks, Russia or a new whistleblower the deep state was involved with foreign governments in creating the 9-11 terror attack. We now have scientific proof WTC 7 did not collapse as the government reported. Dr. Husley has said his next study will prove what did happen. Richard Gage has already proved, with his method, the WTC 7 collapse was a demolition. Suppose, in 2017, the world understands the U.S. deep state helped orchestrate this to bring the U.S. into a war with the Middle East. [Much like the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident was a fake evident—a false flag]—to bring the U.S. into war with Vietnam, suppose the world comes to understand 9-11 was a false flag to create a new U.S. enemy and war. (Click here for a history of false flags.) Suppose 9-11 was a plan to build the U.S. military industrial complex and direct more money to these cash-sucking companies. IF all of this became known and is what happened (this is the very speculative part of this article), do you think that would impact the purchasing power of the dollar? With more than half of our currency held outside the U.S.A., and much of it by countries historically thought of as enemies, do you think it would impact the value of the dollar if the world lost faith and interest in the dollar?

If you don’t know the answers to my last questions, I suggest you read more of my articles.

On Father’s Day, Megyn Kelly tried to cast Alex Jones as a conspiracy nut.[4] She said he thinks 9-11 was an inside job. I’m suggesting Kelly knows the WTC 7 conspiracy fact. She is part of the propaganda and deception. It’s to your advantage to figure this out before everyone else does.

 

“Dollar” Bill is a real guy, with real knowledge on our nation’s financial calamity, and real solutions for what must be done to dig ourselves out of the hole we are in. Due to his career, Bill must remain “disguised” to protect his position. “Bill” loves America, sees the impending cliff we are all headed towards, and hopes that by sharing his inside knowledge of the failed monetary policy in our nation, that a fiscal “nuclear” event can be minimized.